Not 'separate', just Scotland.
In what is being seen as a significant battle won for Scottish nationalists, clerks at the House of Commons in Westminster agreed to stop using the word "separation" in titles of debates on independence. As a compromise, future debates on the effects of independence would be referred to as "post-2014".
The issue arose after a debate tabled by the Labour MP for Inverclyde Ian McKenszie - "The future of Royal Mail [postal service] in a separate Scotland", had its title altered by clerks to "The future of the Royal Mail in Scotland".
According to The Scotsman, the name was changed after the SNP Perth and North Perthsire MP Pete Wishart formally complained about the inclusion of the words "separate" or "separation".
A spokesperson for the Commons, told The Scotsman that the name was changed because a “separate Scotland is hypothetical”, and therefore fell outside the remit of ministers. Labour ministers who had previously protested against the clerks' decision had reportedly been told that the heading of debates are also neutral and the inclusion of the word "separate" was "leading" and "not impartial".