Sri Lankan President Maithriapala Sirisena said that he is expecting to approve capital punishment on the island by next year, if he receives parliamentary approval.

Speaking in Galle today the president said that though he did not have to seek parliamentary approval, he would do consult with parliament and seek its opinion.

Earlier this year, whilst meeting with Buddhist monks Sri Lanka’s Justice Minister Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe also stated that his government was prepared to implement capital punishment in order to put a halt to an increase in crime.

The New York Times called for a special court with international magistrates and investigators to prosecute those responsible for mass atrocities committed in Sri Lanka, in an editorial published on Thursday.

Writing on the release of the OISL report, it said the was “a clear rejection of the proposal made on Monday by Sri Lanka’s foreign minister, Mangala Samaraweera, who told the Council that his government would set up a truth, justice and reconciliation commission, and draft a new constitution”.

The Liberal Party of Canada welcomed the OISL report into mass atrocities in Sri Lanka and said it would work towards investigating and prosecuting perpetrators of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide who may be in Canada.

In a statement released on Friday, the party said it “remains committed to working with the international community to ensure that Canada does its part in seeking justice in Sri Lanka”.

It also said:

“This includes exercising the universal jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute those perpetrators of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide who may be in Canada.  We will also implement a travel ban against those who might have been part of the chain of command within the Sri Lankan armed forces.”

“The victims of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide in Sri Lanka have waited far too long for answers,” said Marc Garneau Liberal Candidate for Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Westmount.  “This report, for the first time, gives some hope on the road to accountability and peace in Sri Lanka.  We commend the witnesses for coming forward with their stories – and braving all odds, and at times taking extraordinary risks to be heard so that justice can be achieved.”

The International Crisis Group said the release of the OISL report was a “dramatic advance” and urged members of the UN Human Rights Council to “mandate significant international participation in all stages of the domestic accountability processes”.

The group further said members of the Council should mandate formal review of the implementation and effectiveness of all truth, reconciliation and accountability mechanisms over the next two years.

Writing in the Huffington Post, the All Party Parliamentary Group for Tamils chairman James Berry called on the British government to lead the world in seeking proper accountability for Sri Lanka’s atrocities. Highlighting ongoing torture, militarisation and economic disempowerment of the Tamil areas in Sri Lanka, he called for the British government to work to end the disenfranchisement of the Tamil North-East of Sri Lanka.

See also:

Colombo has a stronghold on North-East of Sri Lanka: Interview with APPG-T Chair James Berry (04 Sep 2015)

See extracts from his piece here.

Critical moment in Geneva - but will Tamils See justice?

Sri Lanka's President Sirisena has already set his face against any international involvement insisting on a domestic tribunal. By contrast, many Tamil people want to see an international, independent justice mechanism of the kinds established in post-conflict Rwanda and Yugoslavia.

Sri Lanka’s foreign minister said today the government did not want “outside bodies” to do a criminal investigation into the mass atrocities detailed in the UN report, which was released yesterday.

Speaking to press in Colombo, Mangala Samaraweera stressed the “burden” of a criminal investigation was on Sri Lanka and the country will have to initiate legal proceedings where sufficient evidence existed.

The minister said the government is yet to finalise whether international judges or prosecutors will be part of an accountability mechanism, as recommended by the UN’s human rights chief Zeid Hussain.

“The prosecutors, judges, these are the things we have to finalise. We have slight differences in opinions about how it should be done, but I think after the consultations with the people we could find a point of convergence,” he said.

He pointed out that there will be talks with the UN on the establishment of the mechanisms, but stressed the government will not be told what to do.