A public discussion held in Mannar on Saturday warned that the proposed Protection of the State from Terrorism Act (PSTA), which is set to replace the currently enforced Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA) in Sri Lanka, could be used to suppress dissent and target Tamil political expression.
The discussion was organised by the Northern and Eastern Civil Coordination Committee and took place. Participants examined the scope and implications of the proposed legislation, which the Sri Lankan government has said is aimed at ensuring national security and stability.
Speakers at the meeting cautioned that the PSTA, despite being presented as a reform measure, retains many of the features that made the PTA notorious for decades of abuse, particularly against Tamils. Concerns were raised that the law’s broad and vague definitions could be used to criminalise public protests, civil society activism, and political mobilisation.
Participants further warned that the proposed law could extend beyond Sri Lanka’s borders, potentially targeting those living abroad. It was noted that expressions of opinion on social media platforms could also fall within the scope of the legislation, heightening fears of surveillance and repression of diaspora voices critical of the state.
Legal practitioner S. Dinesan participated as a resource person and outlined the legal risks posed by the proposed framework. He highlighted how expansive security laws have historically been weaponised against Tamil political activity, rather than used to uphold genuine public safety.
The discussion was attended by local government chairpersons and members, representatives of women’s organisations, university students, fisheries association representatives, media personnel, and members of various civil society groups.
Those present collectively expressed the view that the introduction of such a law is unnecessary and dangerous, particularly in a context where emergency legislation has repeatedly been used to entrench state repression. Participants strongly condemned the government’s intention to introduce the PSTA and called for sustained opposition to prevent the continuation of draconian security laws under a new name.
