The Sri Lankan navy released a tranche of land that it had occupied for almost a decade in Sampur last week, but pledged not to let the move affect troop deployment in the area.
The military base, which was established in 2007 as the Sri Lankan government launched a major offensive on the North-East, spans across 237 acres in the Eastern Province.
Commander of the Sri Lankan navy, Vice Admiral Ravindra Wijegunaratne, handed the occupied land over to the Governor of the Eastern Province Austin Fernando, in a ceremony also attended by Tamil National Alliance leader R Sampanthan.
Though the land has been handed back to the governor, it is yet to be released to the original Tamil owners, who have been displaced and living in camps for almost a decade.
The military also pledged not to allow the release of the base affect troop deployment in the area.
The Island reported a senior navy official as stating the soldiers have since relocated to an even bigger camp close by. “Relocation of the base wouldn’t in anyway affect the overall deployment in the area,” said the official.
Following the Sri Lankan military occupation of Sampur, Mr Sampanthan had called the establishment of the High Security Zone there a “blatant violation of the fundamental human rights of the Tamil people” and he was concerned “because of the impression that is sought to be created by certain very highly placed Government persons that this Sampoor area was indeed a Sinhalese village in ancient times”.
Some 60,000 Tamils were displaced in the Eastern Province by the massive Sri Lankan military offensive in 2006, which was preceded by an 18 month long economic blockade and triggered a humanitarian crisis. At the time, LTTE political officials slammed the invasion as a severe breach of the February 2002 Ceasefire Agreement (CFA).
Since the displacement, Tamils have repeatedly staged demonstrations calling to be resettled in their original lands.
In our September 2006 editorial the Tamil Guardian said:
“But the occupation of Sampur marks the first forcible occupation of territory since the truce. And it has taken place at a horrendous civilian cost. An estimated 60,000 Tamils are displaced in the east. The fighting has displaced tens of thousands of Muslims there also and tens of thousands more people in Kilinochchi and Jaffna. Sri Lanka's justification of this onslaught - that it was necessary to protect Trincomalee harbour - is utterly spurious. By the same logic, any offensive against LTTE can be justified - to safeguard Batticaloa, Jaffna, Vavuniya, even Colombo. What does the CFA mean then?"
“Expectations of the international community have never been greater than now. The question is what value can be placed on the international promises which have underpinned the peace process thus far. Can the international community get Sri Lanka to respect the CFA? Can it ensure the over 200,000 people displaced in the recent violence receive desperately needed help, despite Sri Lanka's punitive blockade on relief agencies and supplies? Press reports say the Co-Chairs are scheduled to meet next week. In the meantime, large numbers of people, mainly Tamils, are caught in a humanitarian crisis which has been deliberately engineered by Sri Lanka. The dynamics of the infamous 'war for peace' have resumed in earnest.”
Read the full piece here: The Crunch (06 Sep 2006)
Also see more in our earlier posts:
Sampur land release blocked by Supreme Court (16 May 2015)
IDPs urge TNA to reclaim their appropriated land (10 Dec 2013)
New eastern security zone 'discriminates against Tamils' (04 Jul 2007)
60,000 Tamils despair (06 Sep 2006)
Rajapakse hails Sampoor ‘capture’ (06 Sep 2006)