|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Wednesday February 27, 2001
|
|
First milepost on the road to peace
Writing in The Sunday Leader, DBS Jeyaraj tracks the hectic tripartite diplomatic activity that culminated with the signing of last week's historic ceasefire. February 22 was a proud day for Norway the peacemaker. The small
Scandinavian nation responsible for bringing about peace accords in the Middle East and South America had achieved another feat in this direction in Sri Lanka. Norwegian Foreign Minister Jan
Peterssen flanked by his Deputy Foreign Minister Vidar Helgeson and Peace Envoy turned Special Adviser Erik Solheim
announced at 10 a.m. (Norwegian time) in Oslo that a ceasefire agreement had been entered into by the government of Sri
Lanka and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). The ceasefire would come into force from Sunday,
February 24 midnight.
Although Peterssen enjoyed the limelight by being at 'the right place at the right time' to make the announcement, the real kudos for achieving the current ceasefire goes to four
Norwegians. Deputy Foreign Minister Helgeson, Special Adviser Solheim along with Oslo's Ambassador in
Colombo Jon Westborg and Foreign Ministry Official Krjeste Tromsdal comprised the quartet whose untiring
efforts for nearly two months resulted in the permanent ceasefire coming into place. They engaged in a rare brand of shuttle diplomacy
between Europe and Asia to complete their task. There was a crucial difference between this agreement and earlier ones like the Indo - Lanka accord
signed by Rajiv Gandhi and Junius Jayewardene on July 29, 1987 and the 'Cessation of Hostilities' entered into by Chandrika Kumaratunga and Velupillai Prabakharan on January 8, 1995. The earlier ones were bilateral pacts without a third party intermediary. The current ceasefire however was a trilateral
effort with Norway facilitating the process. Thus in this case the ceasefire agreements have been signed separately by Wickremesinghe and Prabakharan instead of jointly as in earlier instances. Instead of the documents having both signatures on all the document papers the endorsements though identical are separate. Both parties were required to sign all three categories. The formulation of the ceasefire agreement as well as the composition of some annexures drew on past experience. Some of the provisions regarding international ceasefire monitoring etc. were duplicated from the abortive 1995 Kumaratunga - Prabakharan cessation of hostilities agreement. Some other clauses from 1995 have been included in the annexures too. Some provisions from the memorandum of understanding document drafted by Nor-way last year have also been utilised. The draft MOU never saw the light of day because of the stonewalling tactics of the Kumaratunga - Kadirgamar duo. Now some aspects have been incorporated as annexures. For example the annexures regarding staggered time tables to send essential items into the Wanni and the quantities involved are from those worked out earlier by Kadirgamar and Kumaratunga. Wickremesinghe, according to sources close to the prime minister, he signed and initialled the relevant documents in the early hours of the morning on February 21 itself. Astrological considerations are said to have play-ed a part in choosing the rig-ht time. After a brief discussion handed over the relevant documents signed by Tiger Leader Prabakharan in the same manner as
Wickremesinghe to the Norwegian envoy. The documents had already been obtained from Prabakharan. Westborg
returned to Colombo in the evening without meeting Praba-kharan but with his official consent. It is learnt that the relevant documents were sent to the Wanni beforehand by the Tiger Political
Adviser and Chief Negotiator Anton Balasingham based in London. With the consent of both parties embodied in explicit documents, the Norwegians naturally were in their seventh 'Valhalla.' The peace process leading to a ceasefire had progressed in fits and starts for nearly two years under Kumaratunga's hegemony. The
Kumaratunga - Kadirgamar duo were working diligently to undermine it while professing vocal support for it. The turning point came with Wickremesinghe's
assent to power as Prime Minister in December last year. The premier invited Norway into the process again formally through official missives and direct telephone calls. This was supplemented when LTTE chief
Prabakharan also re-invited Norway formally by letter addressed to Prime Minister Magne Kjell Bondevik. Balasingham, assisted by his Australian born wife Adele Anne functioning as secretary to the LTTE chief negotiator, has been instrumental in getting the Tigers on board the peace process. It is he who almost single-handedly initiated it on be-half of the LTTE. It is he who persuaded the LTTE
hierarchy into remaining committed to it despite all the negative tactics of the Kum-aratunga - Kadirgamar duo. Balasingham is in a unique position of being trusted to a great extent by his leader Velupillai
Prabakharan on this issue. It is openly acknowledged in diplomatic circles that it was
Balasingham who brought the peace process to this level from the Tiger side. From the government side it was none other than Wickremesinghe himself who spared no effort to make the peace process a veritable success. After the groundbreaking meeting with
Balasingham, the Norwegians came to Colombo on January 9, to commence a series of meetings with Sri Lankan actors in the important political drama. This was followed by several rounds of discussions with Balasingham in London and
Wickremesinghe in Colombo. While envoy Westborg handled the Colombo angle mainly
Solheim along with Tromsdal dealt with London. Balasingham of course was keeping Prabakharan informed of every turn and twist in the process. Every conversation and discussion concerning peace talks with the Norwegians was recorded in English by Mrs. Balasingham. This
along with a Tamil translation by Balasingham were sent regularly to Prabakharan. As the process progressed each and every proposal and suggestion was communicated to Prabakharan for his response. This was obtained and duly forwarded to Oslo by Balasingham. Apart from direct meetings there were numerous telephonic conversations and fascimile messages. As a result of all this activity the Norwegians succeeded in drafting a preliminary ceasefire agreement in the first week of February. Both the government and LTTE were observing unilaterally declared parallel ceasefires separately. What Oslo wanted was to harmonise these into a single, stable and structured ceasefire. The ceasefires extended on a monthly basis were due to lapse on February 24. The goal therefore was to get the permanent ceasefire in place before so that the ones in use need not be extended again. It was with this hope that the Norwegian Deputy
Minister Helgeson led a team to Colombo on February 7. The arrival of the Norwegians with a draft document was naturally highlighted in the national and international press. In spite of the clear knowledge that the draft was subject to changes after further consultations and discussions with both parties some sections of the Sri Lankan and foreign press presented facts in a manner that suggested this draft was in reality the final version. Also certain outstanding
issues of a contentious nature, yet to be resolved, were projected as matters concluded. This led to two types of reaction. The LTTE was annoyed at what it termed as 'deliberate leaks' in the media contrary to the norms of confidentiality emphasised to both parties by Oslo. LTTE Political Adviser and Chief Negotiator Anton
Balasingham complained to Norway about the situation. He pointed out that the leaks had been at Colombo's and not the London end. The Tigers were irritated at the impression created that the ceasefire draft was final whereas several issues remained incomplete. The LTTE felt that sensationalising prickly issues prematurely would jeopardise the negotiating process. The second was the negative reaction from the
Sinhala hawkish elements. Various organisations, political parties and sections of the Buddhist clergy began
protesting jointly and separately against some of the provisions outlined in the press. The vocal critics opined that too much was being conceded to the LTTE and that the long term security of the country was being compromised. The fact that the proposed memorandum of understanding treated both the government and Tigers as equal partners in the agreement was also frowned
upon. As overt protest demonstrations by Sinhala hardliners increased the Royal
Norwegian Embassy in Colombo was compelled to eng-age in some damage control exercises. It issued a press release saying that the work over a ceasefire was incomplete yet 'the Norwegian government would like to make it clear that no formal proposal so far has been presented to the government of Sri Lanka and the LTTE,' the statement said. Oslo's position on this was further amplified and clarified by both Prime
Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe and LTTE theoretician Anton Balasingham separately. The Norwegians paid two successive weekly visits to London to meet
Balasingham. Intense contact was maintained on the telephone too. In Colombo,
Ambassador Westborg was in constant contact with Wickremesinghe and Ministers G. L. Peiris and Tyronne
Fernando. Some concerns were ad-dressed in the ceasefire itself and others through annexures. The fresh draft submitted for consideration by Colombo found government approval. On Tuesday 19, Wickremesinghe was to tell trusted confidantes over dinner that he was awaiting
good news from Oslo. Almost simultaneously in a different time zone in London Erik Solheim and Krjiste Tromsdal were going over the draft agreement and proposed annexures etc. in minute detail with the
Balasinghams. Despite some reservations Balasingham was satisfied about the outcome. The contents of the final version was faxed to
Prabakharan in the Wanni. After lengthy discussions with Balasingham, the Tiger leader agreed to accept it. This decision was formally conveyed to Colombo through Norway. Meanwhile, the draft documents were formally sent to Prabakharan for ratification. It was decided
thereafter that Norway would announce the ceasefire on Friday, February 22, (D - Day) for it coming into force would be 24th midnight. Thus the need to extend ceasefires in vogue were done away with. Both parties made a solemn pledge that they would release provisions of the ceasefire only after Norway announced it at 10 a.m. Thus the government and LTTE in Wanni began releasing details after 3 p.m. on 22nd while Balasingham did so in London after 10 a.m. The urgent necessity in ushering in a permanent
ceasefire was underscored by a confrontation off the coast of Mullaitheevu on 21st. If the ceasefire declaration had not been preplanned the incident may have affected the peace climate considerably. But with the ceasefire on the cards, the incident did not escalate further tensions. Ranil Wickremesinghe met President Kumaratunga on the 20th for two and a half hours from 5 to 7.30 p.m. where he briefed her of all developments and provided copies of the ceasefire. Her endorsement of the
ceasefire agreement was requested. Kumaratunga declined saying she would consider the matter and comment in due course. Thereafter, Wickremesinghe met and briefed the cabinet for one and a half hours from 7. 45 p.m.
onwards. The cabinet accepted the provisions unanimously. It was only after cabinet approval that he went on to sign the agreement on February 21st morning. The A9 highway known as 'highway of death' was fought over for control from 1997 to 1998 resulting in over ten thousand casualties both dead and injured from both sides. Now, it was being opened for civilian traffic peacefully. The road that denoted war at its cruelest was now a metaphor for peace. The prime minister's visit therefore indicated that the war had failed. Re-unification was possible only through peace. It was a lengthy road to peace. The ceasefire agreement was only the first significant milepost on that long, long road. |